Federal Court Lawsuit Settlement Brings Ohio Into Compliance with National Voter Registration Act; Hundreds of Thousands of Low-Income Ohioans to Benefit

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: November 30, 2009

Contacts: Tim Rusch, Demos, (212) 389-1407, trusch@demos.org
Stacie B. Royster, Lawyers' Committee, (202) 662-8317, sroyster@lawyerscommittee.org
Amy Teitelman, Ohio ACORN, (513) 257-9813, ateitelman@acorn.org
Michael McDunnah, Project Vote, (202) 905-1397, mmcdunnah@projectvote.org
 
Cleveland, OH--Low-income Ohio citizens will be ensured access to voter registration at Ohio public assistance offices as a result of a settlement agreement submitted to Federal District Court Judge Patricia A. Gaughan over this past holiday weekend.  
 
The settlement successfully resolves a three-year old lawsuit filed against the Ohio Secretary of State (SOS) and the Director of the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services (ODJFS) in September 2006 by Lorain resident Carrie Harkless, Cleveland resident Tameca Mardis and the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) charging widespread violations of the federal National Voter Registration Act (NVRA). Section 7 of the NVRA requires public assistance agencies to provide voter registration opportunities to their clients.
 
Extensive pre-suit investigation and discovery in the case revealed that many of Ohio's county public assistance offices were ignoring their responsibilities to provide voter registration to their low-income clients. Currently, only 71 percent of low-income Ohioans are registered to vote compared to 90 percent of affluent Ohioans.
 
Before the lawsuit, there was no state official overseeing the state's compliance with the federal law.  Although Ohio has designated the Secretary of State as its chief election official responsible for NVRA compliance, at the time the lawsuit was filed, then-Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell contended that the state's obligation to provide voter registration services to its low-income residents was satisfied by the maintenance of a toll-free hotline for public assistance offices to call. ODJFS claimed that Ohio law prohibited it from ensuring compliance by county offices.  
 
"As a result of the steps the Secretary of State and ODJFS director will take, we expect hundreds of thousands of voting-eligible low-income Ohioans to be registered to vote," said Lisa Danetz, senior counsel in the Democracy Program at Demos and co-lead counsel for the plaintiffs. "We applaud the integration of voter registration into agency processes as well as the planned monitoring of the county public assistance offices."
 
The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, and after a decision by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, the case returned to the district court where it settled after extensive fact discovery.   The Court of Appeals decision established an important precedent that state officials have ultimate responsibility for compliance with this federal law, even when local agencies also have day-to-day responsibility for administering public benefits programs.
 
"The changes made under this agreement represent a long-overdue recognition of the need for an active program of voter registration at public assistance offices in Ohio" said Jon Greenbaum, legal director of the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law.  "With nearly a full year before the next federal general election, we believe that the implementation of these improvements will bring many thousands of Ohio citizens who would otherwise be unregistered to the polls on election day 2010."
 
As a result of the agreement, the provision of voter registration services will be institutionalized within the office procedures at county DJFS offices, and both the SOS and ODJFS will make sure such services are provided.  In particular:
 
-- voter registration application integrated within each agency's benefits forms
-- voter registration incorporated into the statewide computer system used by caseworkers
-- training program for those employees with voter registration responsibilities
-- reporting and monitoring of important data from the statewide computer system, county boards of elections and county DJFS offices
-- at least 20 unannounced spot checks of local agencies each year
-- follow up with counties not providing voter registration services
-- review of voter registration services, using the same mechanisms that it employs to oversee the local provision of food stamps
-- designating the Department of Veterans Affairs, in its administration of medical services and services for homeless veterans, as a voter registration agency
-- work with the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction to encourage voter registration among recently released offenders.
 
"This settlement is good news for all citizens in Ohio and especially the low income communities we serve.  The fact that the state of Ohio will honor its duty under the law by assisting people to register to vote when they are in government offices will help more citizens become voters," said Mary Keith, a member of Ohio ACORN's board of directors.  
 
"Across the country, the people least likely to be registered to vote are those from low-income households," said Teresa James, election counsel for Project Vote. "Our hope is that other states that have been ignoring the NVRA will not wait to be sued to fulfill their obligations to these millions of unregistered Americans."
 
"We are delighted to have worked with our co-counsel and Ohio officials to ensure that Ohio citizens receiving public assistance will be afforded a greater opportunity to register to vote and participate in the democratic process," said Neil Steiner, a partner at Dechert LLP.
 
The groups have filed similar lawsuits in Indiana and New Mexico, and in 2008 successfully settled a lawsuit in Missouri that has led to a vast increase in voter registration applications submitted at the state's public assistance offices. In fact, agency-based registrations in Missouri skyrocketed from 8,000 a year to more than 100,000 in just eight months after the court-ordered settlement. It is estimated that proper implementation of the NVRA's public assistance provisions nationwide could result in 2-3 million additional voter registrations per year.
 
The plaintiffs in the Ohio case are represented by Demos, the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, Project Vote, Dechert LLP and Cleveland attorney Donna Taylor Kolis of Freedman, Domiano & Smith. The full settlement agreement can be viewed at www.demos.org <http://www.demos.org> . 

Thousands of U.S. companies and special interest groups attempt to influence government through campaign donations in ways never before documented, a joint project by two of the nation’s premier government watchdog groups now reveals. The project, conducted by the National Institute on Money in State Politics and the Center for Responsive Politics, also provides an unprecedented resource: Profiles of these organizations' political giving patterns during the 2008 election at both the state and national level.

The “Top National Donors” project integrates the Institute’s state contributions data with the Center for Responsive Politics’ federal contributions data – something never before accomplished. “Innovative policy ideas often flow between the states and the U.S. Congress. For the first time ever, this resource is available and will allow users to see who is trying to exert influence on multiple levels," said Edwin Bender, executive director of the National Institute on Money in State Politics.

"Whether you’re a reporter, activist or ordinary citizen, this data mash-up allows you to explore the extent to which specific interests may be battling over policy armed with political I.O.U.s," said Sheila Krumholz, executive director of the Center for Responsive Politics.

It reveals, for example, that companies and organizations with piqued interest in the federal debate over health care reform are at the same time attempting to bend state-level lawmakers to their corporate and special interests on the same topic. The CRP/Institute study uncovers that several historically active federal-level campaign donors also gave a collective $15.1 million to campaigns in 47 states. They include the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Pfizer, American Medical Association, American Hospital Association, Blue Cross/Blue Shield, AARP and Pharmaceutical Researchers and Manufacturers of America.

While plenty of large, nationally notable companies and organizations top the list – National Education Association, Service Employees International Union, AT&T – others prove less renowned. The Pechanga Band of Mission Indians and Clean Energy Fuels Corp., for example, also rank highly, in large part because of their state-level ballot measure activity. These and a host of other results are available online in a publicly accessible database.

State donors were selected by their total contributions to state-level candidates, party committees and state ballot initiatives during the 2008 election cycle. Federal donors were selected by their total contributions to federal candidates, leadership PACs and party committees in the 2008 election cycle. The totals listed for an organization include contributions from its PACs, employees and subsidiaries. This unique data mash-up is funded by a grant from the Ford Foundation. The work forms the foundation for expanded independent investigation of nationwide influence-peddling trends.

ABOUT THE CENTER FOR RESPONSIVE POLITICS

The Center for Responsive Politics is the nation's premier research group tracking money in U.S. politics and its effect on elections and public policy. The nonpartisan, nonprofit Center aims to create a more educated voter, an involved citizenry and a more responsive government. CRP's award-winning website, OpenSecrets.org, is the most comprehensive resource for campaign contributions, lobbying data and analysis available anywhere. CRP relies on support from a combination of foundation grants and individual contributions. The Center accepts no contributions from businesses, labor unions or trade associations.

ABOUT THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR MONEY IN STATE POLITICS

The National Institute for Money in State Politics is the only nonpartisan, nonprofit organization revealing the influence of campaign money on state-level elections and public policy in all 50 states. Its comprehensive and verifiable campaign-finance database and relevant issue analyses are available for free through its website, FollowTheMoney.org.

Contact: Dave Levinthal, 202-354-0111 (CRP); Edwin Bender, 406-449-2480 (National Institute on Money in State Politics)